EveVideo featured in LocalGov - Dramatically reduce housing disrepair claims

The Costs of Dealing with Housing Disrepair Claims can Dramatically be Reduced

An increasing number of Social Housing organisations are being inundated with housing disrepair claims due to claims management companies and solicitors targeting the tenants.

However, a shortage of qualified inspectors, as well as budget constraints, makes it very difficult to react quickly when a complaint arises.

Therefore, we at https://www.evevideo.com/ have designed a specialist digital inspection product that enables property surveyors to liaise with tenants from their office rather than have to travel to the home.

Importantly, we have access to a national network of surveyors who are highly experienced in dealing with Housing Disrepair Surveys and can undertake a quick inspection and produce a Scott Schedule for as little as £50.

The Surveyor(s) initiate a video conference with the tenant using their mobile phone or desktop in a simple and easy way. The conference is automatically recorded and saved and the recording can be accessed, reviewed, notated, transcribed and made available to colleagues to make sure they can make an informed decision about the state of the property before any unnecessary costs are incurred.

Importantly, you can respond to the tenant quickly and before they get a solicitor involved.

Councils spend £45m on legal disrepair claims in four years.

Councils spend £45m on legal disrepair  claims in four years 

Councils in England spent at least £45m on legal disrepair claims brought by tenants between  2017-18 and 2020-21, Inside Housing can reveal. 

Councils spend £45m on legal disrepair claims in four years #UKhousing  

A Freedom of Information (FOI) request sent by Inside Housing to stock-owning councils  across England showed that in the four years up to the end of March 2021, 70 authorities  which provided figures faced 11,996 claims, with 55 paying out a total of £45.4m dealing  with claims.  

This figure grew to councils paying out £55.1m when the period was stretched to November  2021, with that period also seeing an additional 4,875 cases. 

Of the 70 councils to respond to the FOI on cases, 65 (93%) local authorities had seen an  increase in 2020-21 when compared with 2017/18. 

Of those authorities that provided figures for every year, the total costs increased by 77%  from £7.9m in 2017-18 to £13.8m in 2021-22. 

The costs facing councils are likely to be significantly higher as many of them did not  provide any figures, including more than half of London authorities. Some that did provide  figures did not provide the full costs.  

The issue appears acute in London. Of the 29 boroughs that own and manage housing stock,  including City of London, 12 provided costs to Inside Housing. These revealed they had  spent more than £39m on claims since 2017-18. 

The 17 councils that provided figures saw the number of cases increase to 7,932, which was  up 135% when compared with 2017/18.  

It is also a primarily urban problem: the 12 London boroughs plus Birmingham, Manchester  and Sheffield represent £48m of total costs – 87% of the total figure. The 11 London councils  which provided figures for every year saw costs increase by 53% from £6.4m to nearly £10m  in 2020-21.  

Lambeth topped the list of total costs paid since 2017-18 at £12.1m, followed by Southwark  at £10.1m and Birmingham £5.9m.

The list does not include the councils which refused to provide the figures, as they claimed  that finding the information would go over the £450 cost or 18-hours limit permitted by the  FOI Act. 

Lawyers told Inside Housing that the increases were down to cuts to legal aid in 2013, claims  management firms that previously focused on personal injury claims moving into disrepair,  and rising cases of disrepair due to ageing stock, lack of investment and social landlords  failing to do repairs. 

Councils’ responses  

Lambeth Council spokesperson: “Lambeth has suffered over a decade of funding cuts  through austerity measures and reductions in its income brought about by central government  policies; funds the council would have otherwise invested on repairs and maintenance to  improve estates across the borough. 

“Lambeth, along with other local authorities is experiencing a significant increase in the  number of disrepair claims. At the end of the second quarter of last year, we had 789 live  disrepair cases – six times higher than in 2017. 

“The majority of these claims have been submitted by claims lines based outside of Lambeth,  as law firms seek to supplement loss of revenue throughout the COVID pandemic [and]  housing disrepair being one such revenue stream. Claim management companies which  previously focussed on PPI claims have also turned to housing disrepair. 

“The council is introducing an arbitration scheme for disrepairs, as tenants’ rents currently  fund rising costs and compensation. An investment of £600,000 into the process will then  seek to reduce the overall bill to tenants and redirect funds to deliver frontline services to  tenants. 

“Despite the financial restrictions, Lambeth has invested hundreds of millions of pounds in  improving its council homes and estates in recent years. Homes on the Leigham Court Estate  have benefitted from improvements including new bathrooms and kitchens under the  Lambeth Housing Standard. 

“Lambeth is now pushing ahead with a rolling programme of improvement works, including  windows, for properties on the Leigham Court Estate. This will include work to 60 homes in  this financial year and more in 2022-23, simultaneously the council are undertaking external  repairs, decorations and other works to 41 homes on the estate.” 

Stephanie Cryan, cabinet member for council homes and homelessness at Southwark  Council: “Southwark is the biggest social landlord in London and one of the biggest  nationally. This explains why we have a high number of legal disrepair cases. But it is also  why we are adept at managing these cases in challenging times. 

“We work to settle most legal disrepair cases without the need to attend court and have closed  nearly twice as many claims in the last year, when compared to the year before. However, if  we believe a claim is questionable we will always defend the matter. We were recently  awarded £17,000 in costs, following the successful defence of such a claim.

“One of the underlying causes for legal disrepair cases in Southwark, and for every other  social landlord, is the universal problem created by complex and ageing housing stock. 

“As part of our work to support council tenants, we identified a primary cause for repairs,  leaks from another property, and have worked to address these with an innovative and  people-focused Leaks from Above team. Our dedicated team supports residents from  identification to resolution of their repair. 

“Another problem that local authorities face are ‘claims farmers’ who litter our estates with  flyers and chase work on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis. Southwark is also home to a large number  of solicitors, who focus on this area of work. 

“We have explored different ways of managing claims, to address their growing number. 

“This work and extra resources have helped us to significantly reduce the average cost of  settling a legal disrepair claim over the past five years. 

“As a result of our updated approach, we are seeing some of our challenges resulting in cases  being withdrawn. 

“This is becoming more regular and has helped to reduce disproportionate court costs.” 

Croydon Council spokesperson: “We are aware of rising disrepairs claims across all social  housing providers in recent years. 

“Croydon is itself at the start of a wide-reaching housing improvement journey to make sure  tenants always receive the high standard of support they rightly expect. 

“We are committed to strengthening our responsive repairs service and are working closely  with tenants to prioritise the improvements they identify as most important.” 

Manchester City Council spokesperson: “Last year Northwards Housing was brought back  in house to the council for the first time since 2005. 

“We have since been working to review how the service is operated, with the repairs process  a key element of this piece of work.  

“Even one repair request that escalates to a legal claim is one too many, and we are looking at  the reasons tenants are not getting the service they expect and we are determined to ensure  that the repairs process will continue to improve as a result.”

Evevideo becomes approved RICS Partner

The RICS Tech Partner Programme is a collaboration platform for innovative data and technology across the globe producing thought leadership, content, and market insight for the profession.

By partnering with innovative, leading-edge firms who work across the whole property lifecycle and address all the different asset types, the Programme will provide digital content to help the profession understand and adopt solutions that deliver real value and complement their professional activities.

The Programme highlights the benefits of combining the complementary skill sets of professionals in the property and technology spaces. It encourages the continued collaboration and mutually-beneficial learning between innovators from outside the property sector and the profession itself.

WhatsApp issued second-largest GDPR fine of €225m

WhatsApp has been fined €225m (£193m) by Ireland's data watchdog for breaching privacy regulations.

It is the largest fine ever from the Irish Data Protection Commission, and the second-highest under EU GDPR rules.

Facebook, which owns WhatsApp, has its EU headquarters is in Ireland, and the Irish regulator is the lead authority for the tech giant in Europe.

WhatsApp said it disagrees with the decision, and the severity of the fine, and plans to appeal.

The fine relates to an investigation which began in 2018, about whether WhatsApp had been transparent enough about how it handles information.

The issues involved were highly technical, including whether WhatsApp supplied enough information to users about how their data was processed and if its privacy policies were clear enough.

Those policies have since been updated several times.

"WhatsApp is committed to providing a secure and private service," a company spokesperson said.

"We have worked to ensure the information we provide is transparent and comprehensive and will continue to do so. We disagree with the decision today regarding the transparency we provided to people in 2018 and the penalties are entirely disproportionate."

GDPR rules allows for mammoth fines of up to 4% of the offending company's global turnover.

The Irish DPC said it had submitted its decision to other national data authorities, as required under GDPR, "following a lengthy and comprehensive investigation", and received objections from eight countries, including Germany, France, and Italy.

Some disagreed with the Irish regulator about which specific articles of GDPR had been broken or the way the fine had been calculated, among other issues.

And in late July, the European Data Protection Board told the Irish DPC to tweak its finding, "reassess" its proposed fine of €30-50m (£26-43m) and amend its decision "by setting out a higher fine amount".

Formally reprimanded

This "shows how the DPC is still extremely dysfunctional", privacy campaigner Max Schrems said, welcoming the decision.

"The DPC gets about 10,000 complaints per year since 2018 - and this is the first major fine," he said.

And because of WhatsApp's planned appeal, "in the Irish court system, this will mean that we will see years before any fine is actually paid".

The Irish DPC has also formally reprimanded WhatsApp and ordered it to "bring its processing into compliance", however.

Only Amazon has been fined more for breaking GDPR rules, in a case it is also vigorously defending.

In July, Luxembourg's regulator fined Amazon €746m for what it said was non-compliance with data-processing laws.